A billboard from Swehl, a company design to support families in the breastfeeding journey, was removed from Times Square because the image “violated guidelines on acceptable content.” The image features celebrity cookbook author Molly Baz and her pregnant belly, holding Swehl’s lactation cookies over her breasts, which are also in a bra, by the way.
Many news outlets have led with describing Molly in the image as “mostly nude”. Is she? Actually, let’s talk about the fact that she’s pregnant. And breastfeeding can be really hard for many women yet our society judges women who don’t breastfeed. It shouldn’t matter if they won’t or they can’t, it’s their choice. So to further create shame around the image overall, when I think you’d be hard-pressed to find a woman in your life who doesn’t have some kind of complicated feelings around her body, just sets us back.
This New York Times article reminds us of so many other things around women’s health that are censored in this industry.
“Advertising has long had an ambivalent relationship with women’s health content. It was not until 2017 that an ad for period products was allowed to run using red liquid, as opposed to what has been deemed the more palatable blue. In 2020, an ad by the mother and baby care brand Frida that realistically depicted the pain of postpartum recovery was rejected from airing during the Oscars. And online content related to women’s health or breastfeeding is often censored on social media, as was the case for the baby care company Tommee Tippee, which ran a campaign titled “Boob Life” for its breast pumps, depicting a montage of realistic breastfeeding vignettes and breasts.”
Just getting women access to information about their health should not be so difficult.
I wonder who flagged the content? As E.L.F. Beauty recently pointed out, there are a lotttttta Dicks sitting on corporate boards.